🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute small “ham sandwich”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have become pawns in a tussle between a closed attraction, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the heated controversy over their fate often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the people who interact with them daily.

After the Canadian government blocked the export of the belugas to China, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are kept warned to end their lives unless the federal government pays for the expense of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and group interactions indicate they are remarkably smart animals – something one caretaker observed first-hand.

She spent several years as a whale caretaker, a role that entailed earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She developed a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting personalities.

“One whale selected me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “Each changed the way I perceive bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s relationship with the whales developed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their confinement.

During her tenure at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, died. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say points to the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they grab fragments and swim around with chunks in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not reply to a request for comment, but previously asserted: “The whales … receive far better veterinary services and around the clock supervision than any human in the UK, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the facility in recent months following the death of Eos, an ailing beluga the employees had to put down. She said the facility suspected particulars of the incident were disclosed to the press and she was fired soon after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in despair. She says the facility’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any efforts to put down even a single beluga would require “immense personnel”, vehicles and specialized tools.

“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for calls for the whales to be taken right away from the facility, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister rejected a bid to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a ongoing life in captivity and a return to display for amusement,” the minister stated. “As society, we know that whales are meant for the wild, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in good conscience approve an relocation that would perpetuate the treatment these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s statements reveal a more general misunderstanding of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to understand these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As officials work to find a resolution, ideas have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A proposed protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has been most controversial. The prospective location, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain optimistic that it could eventually represent a permanent solution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the idea of a sanctuary represents a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a feasible approach in the coming months.

The project lead, head of the plan, said the location will simulate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales get from specialists, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|